Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + SC Companies Law - 2003 (7) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2003 (7) TMI 588 - SUPREME COURTWhether the contract between the parties was executed before the Act came into force, hence, the Act does not apply? Whether dispute is a stale one having arisen nearly 20 years ago? Whether Clause 23 of the agreement contemplates the adjudication of a dispute by a company arbitrator? Whrther no person other than an arbitrator nominated in clause 23 of the argument has any jurisdiction to entertain the disputes? Held that:- All these grounds of attack can very well be raised before the Arbitrator appointed by the Designated Judge, hence, on the facts of the case, we find the writ petition of the appellant was liable to be dismissed by the High Court. For this reason, we do not think it appropriate to remand the matter back to the High Court. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal permitting the appellant to raise all its contentions before the Arbitrator appointed by the Designated Judge.
|