Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Section Wise 1973 1973 (10) This

Law	-- All -- GST Income Tax Benami Property Customs Corporate Laws Securities / SEBI Insolvency & Bankruptcy FEMA PMLA Service Tax Central Excise CST, VAT & Sales Tax Wealth tax Indian Laws
Court	-- Any -- Supreme Court SC Orders / Highlights High Court Appellate Tribunal Tribunal Appellate authority for Advance Ruling Advance Ruling Authority National Financial Reporting Authority Competition Commission of India ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY Commission Central Government Board DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court Commissioner / Appellate Authority Other
Citation	--Year-- 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 Upto 1949 - -Volume- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 -
Landmark	Nil - N/A Referred in >= 3 Cases Referred in >= 4 Cases Referred in >= 5 Cases Referred in >= 10 Cases Referred in >= 15 Cases Referred in >= 25 Cases Referred in >= 50 Cases Referred in >= 100 Cases
Order by	TMI Citation Date of Decision

Advanced Search Options

Case Laws

Showing 41 to 53 of 53 Records

• 1973 (10) TMI 13 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT
  

  Gift Tax Act, 1958 - " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the provisional assessment for the assessment year 1960-61 is an assessment within the meaning of the second proviso to section 2(xx) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 ? "

  ---

• 1973 (10) TMI 12 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
  

  The order challenged herein is an order made by the Commissioner of Income-tax under section 264 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act). By the said order, the Commissioner dismissed the two revision petitions preferred by the petitioner against the levy of interest under section 215 - The issue that minor income was not to be included in the assessee's estimate of advance tax was pending before Supreme Court, whether this can be a valid ground for waiver of interest under section 215 – held that dismissal of the revision petition without considering this contention would be bad in law

  ---

• 1973 (10) TMI 11 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
  

  Whether, within the meaning of section 275 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, penalty order must not only be made within two years of the completion of the proceedings for the imposition of penalty concerned but also communicated to the assessee within the said period of limitation ? - " The order imposing penalty under section 271(1)(c) should be passed within two years from the dateof the completion of the proceedings in the course of which the proceedings for the imposition of penalty had been commenced and it is not necessary that the communication of the same to the assessee should also be within the said period of two years."

  ---

• 1973 (10) TMI 10 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT
  

  Gift Tax Act, 1958 - firm is reconstituted admitting to minor sons of one of the partners to the benefits of partnership - shares of other partners are redistributed - whether it amounts to gift by father as his share is reduced

  ---

• 1973 (10) TMI 9 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
  

  " Whether Tribunal was correct in holding that the transaction of giving Rs. 45,000 to Smt. Gatkoo Bai was neither a valid partition nor a family arrangement nor a valid gift and, therefore, disallowance of interest of Rs. 2,898, Rs. 2,838 and Rs. 2,336 in the assessment for the years 1959-60, 1960-61 and 1961-62, respectively, was correctly made ? " - submission of the learned counsel for the assessee that the transfer of the aforesaid sum of Rs. 45,000 to Smt. Gatkoo Bai represented a family arrangement cannot, therefore, be accepted.

  ---

• 1973 (10) TMI 8 - KERALA HIGH COURT
  

  Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that the assessee-company's claim for deduction of a sum of Rs. 55,545, being the difference between the book value of the Government securities held by the assessee and the value at which they were taken over by Lord Krishna Bank Ltd., on the amalgamation of the assessee with the said bank has been rightly rejected by the Income-tax Officer ? " - The fact that the assessee practically ceased to do business simultaneously does not alter the character or the nature of the transaction. The sum of Rs. 55,544.05, therefore, should have been deducted from the other business income of the assessee computed by the authorities. - We answer the question referred to us in the negative that is in favour of the assessee and against the department.

  ---

• 1973 (10) TMI 7 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
  

  Total income of the family - Hindu undivided family held shares in a company and the karta was a director - sitting fees and commission received by the director - "Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the sums of Rs. 1,000 and Rs. 10,348 are liable to be included in the total income of the Hindu undivided family for the assessment year 1965-66 ? Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the sums of Rs. 14,750 and Rs. 11,348 are liable to be included in the total income of the Hindu undivided family for the assessment year 1966-67 ? "

  ---

• 1973 (10) TMI 6 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
  

  Estate Duty Act, 1953 - " 1. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the inclusion of the value of cash gifts of Rs. 10,000 each made by the deceased in favour of the minor daughters, by applying the provisions of section 10 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, is valid in law ? 2. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the inclusion of Rs. 15,000 which was a deposit made by the donee in the firm of Messrs. T. Govinda Rao and Sons as property belonging to the deceased by applying the provisions of section 10 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, is valid in law ? " - question No. 1 is answered in the affirmative and against the accountable person. Question No. 2 is answered in the negative and in favour of the accountable person

  ---

• 1973 (10) TMI 5 - MADRAS HIGH COURT
  

  Commercial expediency - Assessee is a private limited company carrying on business in the purchase and sale of motor vehicles, spare parts and accessories and agricultural implements besides having a number of workshops where servicing and repairs to vehicles as well as body building is done - assessee-company bought land in the name of District Collector for construction of houses for company's workers by Government under a scheme. Similar expenditure was to be incurred for a few years. Whether the amount spent for the purchase can said to be wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the assessee's business and whether assessee acquired a capital asset or advantage of an enduring benefit

  ---

• 1973 (10) TMI 4 - DELHI HIGH COURT
  

  The assessee had business loss in India and dividend income from Pakistan company, the dividend income was taxable 100 per cent. in Pakistan - " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the net dividend income of Rs. 2,27,472 received from a Pakistan company and the capital gains of Rs. 50,829 were not deductible in arriving at the total world loss under section 24(1) ?

  ---

• 1973 (10) TMI 3 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
  

  Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that no penalty was leviable in this case under section 271 (1)(c) read with the Explanation thereto and in deleting the penalty of Rs. 50,000 levied by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner - Whether the cash found in the possession of the assessee can be treated as belonging to him rejecting his explanation that it did not belong to him

  ---

• 1973 (10) TMI 2 - MYSORE HIGH COURT
  

  Interpretation of section 179 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - private company was struck off the register of companies - liability of past director for tax due by the company

  ---

• 1973 (10) TMI 1 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
  

  Outstanding tax liability of another concern paid by the assessee on taking over assets and liabilities of the other concern - Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the sum of Rs. 1,01,095 was not allowable as deduction by reason of the provisions contained in section 40(a)(ii)

  ---

123