Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Central Excise This
A Public Forum.
Anyone can participate to share knowledge.
We acknowledge the contributions of Experts/ Authors.

Submit new Issue / Query

Eligibility of documents issued by importers during 2012-13 for credit purpose, Central Excise

Issue Id: - 111652
Dated: 18-3-2017
By:- Himansu Sha

Eligibility of documents issued by importers during 2012-13 for credit purpose


  • Contents

Sir,

My query is

The importers were added in rule 9 of CE rules for taking regn wef Dec,13

Before that they were passing credit as the dealers after taking regn

Dept. Many times objects this as ineligible since the invoice issued by importers is not a valid document before 2013.

Is there any circular/instructions

Kindly clarify

Regards

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 4 of 4 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 19-3-2017
By:- YAGAY AND SUN

Earlier to the above period Importer were allowed to get the refund of SAD if the goods imported by them are sold as such.


2 Dated: 19-3-2017
By:- Himansu Sha

No, it is not about SAD. Only. Even today SAD is refunded if not passed on. It is about the credit of all the components ex cept. Customs duties and cess.


3 Dated: 20-3-2017
By:- YAGAY AND SUN

We could not find any relevant circular/notification prior to year 2013.


4 Dated: 20-3-2017
By:- Himansu Sha

My research on the said subject culminates with the following points

A. The notf. No. 32/94-ce non tariff allowed the credit on the basis of invoices issued by the importer.

B. With the amendments vide notf. 5/95 the importers were required for regn.

C. In the new rule 9 of CE though the specific mention was not there for importers, they were like any other traders to take regn as dealers.

D. Moreover at the relevant time the invoice issued by the importers was relevant document for taking credit under rule 9 of CCR.

E. It emerges that the specific requirement of regn was not there to take regn even if they can issue invoices.

F. A draft circular was circulated inviting comments in this regard to mitigate such problems

F. Perhaps due to the noon requirement of regn., the circular was not issued


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates