Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Goods and Services Tax - GST This
A Public Forum.
Anyone can participate to share knowledge.
We acknowledge the contributions of Experts/ Authors.

Submit new Issue / Query

Interest Liability under GST, Goods and Services Tax - GST

Issue Id: - 118765
Dated: 20-9-2023
By:- THYAGARAJAN KALYANASUNDARAM

Interest Liability under GST


  • Contents

Dear Friends,

One of my client has paid the tax liability after setting of ITC from July to March,2018 under GST regime. However, due to some technical glitches, GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 was not filed. Now, my client has received a notice from the GST department for interest liability and even after giving explanation, they said the money lying in cash ledger, until the return filed and adjusted against the liability from the cash credit ledger, the interest need to be paid. Please advice me, how to handle this matter. Also, please let me know any case laws supporting this issue.

Post Reply

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 7 of 7 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 21-9-2023
By:- KALLESHAMURTHY MURTHY

Interest Liability under GST:-

The query lacks certain information. It is said that GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 were not filed. Then how and when the tax liability was paid setting off ITC. Money lying in the Cash Ledger doesn't mean payment of liability. It is just like an SB account in a Bank. If you have a loan account in that bank unless you paid or transferred out of the SB account, it won't be a credit to the loan account and for the said period interest will attract. So, your client is required to pay interest out of the cash ledger for any delayed payment of tax. If GSTR-3B is not filed within the extended due date, your client lose ITC benefit u/s 16(4).

Hope you get the solution.

Regards.


2 Dated: 21-9-2023
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Dear Querist,

A case law which is in favour of the party is posted here. Pl. read word for word and those case which have been relied upon.

2023 (1) TMI 687 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - AFT TOBACCO PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER, CGST & C. EX., NEW DELHI


3 Dated: 22-9-2023
By:- vijay kumar

How a debit is made without filing the return? Both are concurrent I suppose.. Even if you mean to say that cash was deposited or balance was there in cash ledger, unless it is debited & return filed, it doesn't amount to payment of tax under the provisions. I think Department's view is correct


4 Dated: 22-9-2023
By:- Amit Agrawal

What were "technical glitches" along-with evidence you have to support such claim & why same were not resolved over 5 years now?


5 Dated: 22-9-2023
By:- KASTURI SETHI

The burden of proof for 'technical glitches' is cast upon the tax payer. Documentary evidence is required to get the relief.


6 Dated: 22-9-2023
By:- Padmanathan Kollengode

My understanding of the issue:

1. The assessee has only "deposited" the tax through challan in electronic cash ledger.

2. The assessee has not filed the Returns from July to Match 2018

That means, the ITC has not been reported and cash ledger has not been offset.

The only remedy in my opinion is a writ petition. Pls consult an expert advocate in the said matter.


7 Dated: 22-9-2023
By:- THYAGARAJAN KALYANASUNDARAM

Dear Friends,

Thank you so much for your valuable reply. I am going to file writ petition before madras high court shortly. Please let me know if there is any development in other high courts.


Page: 1

Post Reply

Quick Updates:Latest Updates