Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Goods and Services Tax - GST This
A Public Forum.
Anyone can participate to share knowledge.
We acknowledge the contributions of Experts/ Authors.

Submit new Issue / Query

E way Bill non generation, Goods and Services Tax - GST

Issue Id: - 118766
Dated: 22-9-2023
By:- vignesh VSACCOUNTOPRIVATELIMITED

E way Bill non generation


  • Contents

Sir. Kindly clarrify,Goods were moved by vehicle driver with Delivery Challan and he moved to weigh bridge and failed to collect E way bill at 4.50 pm and Eway bill was raised by the company by 5.01 pm. Meanwhile vehicle was intercepted by rovig squad and penalty was levied. kindly clarrify any probability of appeal and getting back penalty paid as refund

Post Reply

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 15 of 15 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 22-9-2023
By:- Padmanathan Kollengode

Can you clarify the full facts sir?

From where to Where the goods where moving?

What time was the movement Started?

What time was the goods intercepted?

Was e-way bill generated at the time of interception?


2 Dated: 22-9-2023
By:- Padmanathan Kollengode

Pls find the FAQ on E-way Bill dated 16-6-2019 issued in CBIC website:

Whether the e-way bill is required for movement of consignment for weighment to the weighbridge?

No e-Way bill is required for movement of goods upto a distance of 20 Km from the place of business of consignor to a weighbridge for weighment or from the weighbridge back to the place of business of consignor, within the same State, subject to the condition that the movement of goods is accompanied by a delivery challan issued in accordance with Rule 55.

Check whether your case is covered under the same. if so, pls show this FAQ at https://cbic-gst.gov.in/pdf/18062019-FAQs-EwayBill-Faq.pdf


3 Dated: 22-9-2023
By:- vignesh VSACCOUNTOPRIVATELIMITED

sir

From where to Where the goods where moving?- Goods were moving to weighbridge under delivery challan but no value mentioned and address of consignee was mentioned in delivery challan

What time was the movement Started? 4.35 PM

What time was the goods intercepted? 4.50 PM

Was e-way bill generated at the time of interception? yes sir, Eway bill generated by 5.01 PM


4 Dated: 22-9-2023
By:- Padmanathan Kollengode

if the weighbridge is within 20 Km in same state, no e-way bill required as per CBIC FAQ. Make use of the same.


5 Dated: 22-9-2023
By:- vignesh VSACCOUNTOPRIVATELIMITED

Thank u sir.but in delivery challan consignee name was mentioned instead of mentioning goods were moved for weigh bridge, will there be any issue on the same?


6 Dated: 22-9-2023
By:- Padmanathan Kollengode

If you are otherwise able to prove that goods was going to weighbridge, it should not be a problem.


7 Dated: 23-9-2023
By:- vignesh VSACCOUNTOPRIVATELIMITED

sir.Value of goods not mentioned in DC! any inputs on this?


8 Dated: 23-9-2023
By:- Padmanathan Kollengode

If the Delivery Challan is defective and there is no accompanying e-way bill also, Department is bound to levy penalty on interception. In case any notice has been already issued to you, it is advisable to consult an expert to file a reply based on the exact allegations of the Department.


9 Dated: 23-9-2023
By:- KASTURI SETHI

10 Dated: 23-9-2023
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Also see the definition and scope of 'human error' on Wikipedia which will be a plus point in this case in your favour.


11 Dated: 24-9-2023
By:- Shilpi Jain

All said and done the only way to defend the penalty levied is approaching the HC. At the HC a liberal view is taken sometimes where there is no evasion of tax the penalty is kept at minimum.


12 Dated: 24-9-2023
By:- vignesh VSACCOUNTOPRIVATELIMITED

Thank u all for providing inputs on the issue. Can u pls explain Rule 138(D) can i take advantage of this rule as time of interception was 4.50 pm and E-way bill generated by 5.01 pm, in my case it is well within 30minutes , is my undertanding correct?


13 Dated: 25-9-2023
By:- Padmanathan Kollengode

Rule 138D provides for facility for transporter to upload the information regarding the detention of vehicle. In my humble opinion, this Rule is not of any help in your case here.


14 Dated: 26-9-2023
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Sh.Vignesh Ji,

Rule 138 (D) is not relevant here.


15 Dated: 26-9-2023
By:- Ganeshan Kalyani

Mainly the movement of goods should be legal. The same is proved when the documents are properly made and carried with the vehicle. If there is any suspicious then the officer is bound to detain the vehicle. You know well about the transaction but officer is not known about it. So he will go by the document prevailing with the driver and will make his view based on it.


Page: 1

Post Reply

Quick Updates:Latest Updates