Imposition of penalty u/s 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 - ...

Case Laws Customs

November 21, 2016

Imposition of penalty u/s 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 - clandestine removal of goods - forgery of signatures of CHA on the bills of entry - the penalty imposed on the appellant by the adjudicating authority are on higher side - reduced to 50% - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty u/s 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 - ...

Case Laws Customs

November 21, 2016

You may also like:

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

Confiscation of goods - Clandestine removal of goods - since goods were within factory, means rea manifesting that goods were ready for clandestine removal has not been...

Clandestine removal - CENVAT credit Demand - Penalty - shortage of goods - Mere signing of the chart alleging removal of finished goods cannot be treated as clear...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on an employee of the Customs Broker - classification of imported goods - The commissioner has recorded as finding...

Clandestine removal - penalty - The unquestioned documentary evidence would suffice to establish the clandestine removal and the handling of such goods by M/s Royal...

Clandestine removal of goods – For clandestine removal of finished goods, personal penalties are required to be imposed upon the Director and vice President of the main...

Clandestine removal - MS Ingots - the findings of clandestine removal cannot be upheld based upon the third party documents, unless there is clinching evidence of...

Clandestine removal - penalty has rightly been imposed on the appellants for their collaborative role in the conspiracy of clandestine removal of goods by M/s HSAL and...

Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the...

Imposition of penalty - section 112(b) of Customs Act - smuggling - diamonds - The active role of these Appellant, do not justify imposition of heavy penalty under...

Imposition of Penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 - quantum of penalty - clandestine removal - appellant unknowingly got involved as an employee in the clandestine activity of...

Excess goods not clandestine removal – non accountal of the goods, which are not meant for clandestine removal would not attract penal provisions, inasmuch as mens rea...

Clandestine removal - duty & penalty - shortages found during the physical stock carried out by the preventive Officers of the Department - shortage admitted and duty...

Imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) - employees of CHA - violation of import conditions - Goods diverted with his knowledge - The imposition of penalty on the Appellant,...

100% EOU - served from India scheme (SFIS) - Recovery of duties of customs foregone - There is no finding in the order of the original authority holding the goods liable...

Quick Updates: