Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation was not made on the basis of ...

Income Tax

February 28, 2017

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation was not made on the basis of unverifiable transactions but the estimation of income was based on specific transactions carried out fraudulently and proved as bogus with supporting material evidences found in the case of assessee - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation was not made on the basis of ...

Income Tax

February 28, 2017

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

Levy of Penalty u/s 271AAA or u/s 271(1)(c) - whether addition is made on estimation basis or on the basis of certain evidences, fact remains that the additions made in...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - difference of income in the return filed u/s.139(1) and 153A - there was no such allegation that of assessee was found to be the owner of any...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act is leviable to be imposed only where the assessee has concealed its particulars of income or furnished...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus purchases @ 25% on total purchase - After analyzing the order of the A.O. as well as the ld. CIT(A), we also found that both the lower...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income u/s 44AD - addition made on credit summation made by the assessee - revenue had not come out with clear case of suppression...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income was declared in survey u/s 133A - date of filing of return u/s 139(1) had not expired - The fact of “concealment of income” and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Basis adopted during the assessment proceedings cannot be used in the penalty proceedings without following the due process. As such, to...

Levying the penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - Just for making wrong claims made advertently or inadvertently, therefore, penalty cannot be levied u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act and...

Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - estimation of disallowance at 50% of commission and improvement expenditure - in this case, the additions were made on the basis of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - AO has not applied his mind before initiating the penalty proceedings rather borrowed his satisfaction from the “tax...

Quick Updates: