Penalty u/s 78 - absence of mens rea or not? - Had the appellant ...

Service Tax

June 26, 2018

Penalty u/s 78 - absence of mens rea or not? - Had the appellant acted under bonafide belief, then they ought to have cooperated in the investigation. But it has come on record that they did not corporate with the department nor produced the record for quantification of service tax liability - demand confirmed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 78 - absence of mens rea or not? - Had the appellant ...

Service Tax

June 26, 2018

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 78 - they were under bonafide belief that service provided from SEZ unit is not chargeable to Service Tax. Therefore the payment of Service Tax was escaped...

Penalty u/s 78 - Once it is categorically held by Commissioner (Appeals) that appellant was under a bonafide belief that service tax as demanded was not payable, then a...

Levy of penalty u/s 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - taxability of Sale of Space or Time for Advertisement - it is a case of bonafide mistake - no penalty - AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - there was a bonafide error in not recording the amount in the ST-3 return is seems to be acceptable - penalty waived - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bonafide belief - Taxability of capital gain arises on sale of land - in absence of any monetary consideration assessee was under a bonafide...

Extended period of limitation - bonafide belief - The appellants have not been able to show any ground by which they could claim that they entertained a bonafide belief...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bonafide belief - restriction of claim of deduction u/s 80IC to 25% from 100% claimed on account of substantial expansion - differing orders...

Penalty u/s 272A(2)(c) - Non-issuance of TDS certificate in time - assessee was under bonafide belief that once the tax has not been deposited to the Government account...

Imposition of penalty - The mens rea is not required to be proved as necessary ingredient for imposition of penalty under sub-section (5) of Section 78, on proving...

Penalty u/s 76 & 78 - provisions of Section 78 having been invoked and penalty imposed, Section 76 penalty may not be justified - AT

Penalty u/s 78 - share broking services - in the facts and circumstances of the case, assessee has acted bonafide - neither extended period of limitation is attracted...

Imposition of penalty - Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - the non-payment of tax was on account of bonafide belief and the Revenue had conducted Audits which would...

Levy of penalties u/s 77 and 78 - Bonafide belief - assessee had in fact recovered Service Tax periodically from the service recipient. Not only that such service tax...

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

Levy of penalty - in case of confirmation of demand u/s 73(A) there is no application of Section 76 and 78 for imposition of penalty. Therefore, the adjudicating...

Quick Updates: