Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2018 Year 2018 This

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - where higher depreciation was ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

October 10, 2018

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - where higher depreciation was wrongly claimed under bona fide belief in respect of nature of equipment and its professional use, no penalty would be leviable.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

  2. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction of LTCG u/s 54F - The assessee acted in bona fide belief and made the claim is not acceptable due to any reason and was...

  3. Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – In the garb of the bona fide claim an assessee cannot escape levy of penalty - Onus was not on the AO to prove the negative - AT

  5. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - gift was received under bona fide belief that the same was a genuine gift - it was taxed during assessment proceedings but the penalty...

  6. Penalty under section 271(1)(c) – assessee in bona fide belief that Dharmada collections were not part of its income but were diverted by an overriding title towards...

  7. Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - bona fide or mala fide with an intention to evade taxes - not exigible to levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act where the...

  8. Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

  10. Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

  11. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

  12. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 35 - AO has not brought out his case as to why penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act...

  13. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Revenue may or may not agree with this understanding of law of the assessee but the fact that there can be a bona fide view to that effect...

  14. Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - claimed higher deduction u/s.36(1)(viia) based on opinion of the Central Statutory Auditors - latter on based on different view canvassed against...

  15. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The Revenue argued that the assessee's actions constituted furnishing inaccurate particulars of income or concealing income. However, the High...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates