Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Minor differences in estimation ...

Case Laws Income Tax

November 10, 2018

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Minor differences in estimation and consequent valuation are but natural and so long as fundamental methodology so adopted by the valuation officer are not disputed, such minor differences in valuation cannot form the basis for levy of penalty

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Minor differences in estimation ...

Case Laws Income Tax

November 10, 2018

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

Notice u/s 271AAB to levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO gets the jurisdiction to levy the penalty by issuing a notice and therefore, it is not a procedural requirement but...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disclosure of additional income consequent to survey operation - the explanations of the assessee that he has declared additional income...

The ITAT Mumbai ruled on penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for estimation of income on bogus purchases. The tribunal held that penalty cannot be levied on additions made on an...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 35 - AO has not brought out his case as to why penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act...

Validity of the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) or 158BFA - AO has levied the penalty under section 271(1)(C) of the Act by observing that the assessee has concealed/furnished...

Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - estimation of disallowance at 50% of commission and improvement expenditure - in this case, the additions were made on the basis of...

Levy of Penalty u/s 271AAA or u/s 271(1)(c) - whether addition is made on estimation basis or on the basis of certain evidences, fact remains that the additions made in...

Penalty u/s 271AAA or 271(1)(c) - The penalties u/s 271(1)(c) and 271AAA are attracted in different situations and both are mutually exclusive. Having initiated the...

Quick Updates: