Penalty u/r 26 of CER - Clandestine removal - Once the penalty ...

Case Laws Central Excise

February 21, 2019

Penalty u/r 26 of CER - Clandestine removal - Once the penalty was imposed on a partnership firm, no separate penalty should be imposed on the partners separately for the reason that the partnership firm itself is consisting of partners

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/r 26 of CER - Clandestine removal - Once the penalty ...

Case Laws Central Excise

February 21, 2019

You may also like:

Imposition of Penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 - quantum of penalty - clandestine removal - appellant unknowingly got involved as an employee in the clandestine activity of...

Imposition of penalties on partners of manufacturing firm u/r 26 of CER - non-payment of Central Excise duty by the partnership firm, M/s Allied Electricals - It is not...

Levy of Personal Penalty on the Director of the company and Drivers of the trucks (transporters) - Penalties u/r 26 of CER - Abetment - Clandestine removal - gutka - The...

Penalty u/s 112 - since penalty has been imposed on partnership firm under Section 112 (a), separate penalty on its partner would not be justified - AT

Exemption u/s 10(26) - Exemption to individual members of Scheduled Tribes - Whether a partnership firm, formed by individual partners who are entitled to an exemption...

Levy of penalty on Proprietor of the Firm under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - Taking note of the fact that penalty...

Penalty u/r 25 or 26 of CER - Mentioning wrong rule number - The first appellate authority was not correct in holding that mentioning Rule 25 was a typographical error...

Imposition of penalty u/r 26 of CER 2002 on transporters - clandestine removal - there is no evidence to prove that the lorry drivers or the owners had involved...

Levy of penalty on Director u/r 26 of CER - involvement of the director of the appellants in clandestine activities or not - here are not much reasoning has been...

Penalty under rule 26 of the CER, 2002 can be imposed on a person only when it is proved beyond doubt that the person dealing with excisable goods knew or had reason to...

Clandestine removal - penalty has rightly been imposed on the appellants for their collaborative role in the conspiracy of clandestine removal of goods by M/s HSAL and...

Clandestine removal of goods – For clandestine removal of finished goods, personal penalties are required to be imposed upon the Director and vice President of the main...

Penalty u/r 26 - in the present case it is not the case of the clandestine removal of the goods but non-receipt of the inputs and fraudulent availment of the credit...

Levy of penalty - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - It was contended that, Penalty under Rule 26(2) provision can be imposed only on a natural person. - The...

Penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 - Clandestine manufacture and removal - If providing blank challans/invoices to a company to enable them to remove the manufactured goods...

Quick Updates: