Oppression and mismanagement - Directors were under a ...

Companies Law

May 31, 2019

Oppression and mismanagement - Directors were under a responsibility to disclose to all the shareholders that further shares are to be issued and such of them as were interested, may apply for further shares in proportion to their shareholding - taking a defence that on earlier occasions, the original Petitioners did not invest much and thus, they were not interested and so it was not necessary to offer shares to them is wrong - allotment canceled

View Source

← Previous Next →

Oppression and mismanagement - Directors were under a ...

Companies Law

May 31, 2019

You may also like:

Oppression and Mismanagement - Issue of Right Shares - subsequent Rights Issue during the pendency of 1st Rights Issue - gross under-subscription of the rights issue -...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Transfer of Shares - allotment of shares - Forum Shopping - It is clear that even as on 1998, there was no business conducted by the...

Oppression and mismanagement - appellant has no inherent right to continue as Managing Director/Director in the 1st respondent unless he is able to carry the majority...

Oppression and mismanagement - removal of the Petitioner from the Directorship - the instant Company Petition is maintainable U/s.241 of the Companies Act, 2013, and the...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Allegations of financial mismanagement and irregularities by the promoters/directors - The High court acknowledged that despite the...

Allegation of oppression and mismanagement - The decision of the majority would prevail in the interest of the Company and its shareholders per se. Therefore, he cannot...

There are certain oppression and mismanagement. The relationship between the Majority Shareholders & Minority Shareholders are strained. Hence, there is a need for...

Oppression and Mismanagement - allotment of shares - continuation as additional (3rd) director after 26.9.2010 is not as per law as was not regularised in AGM - Board...

Oppression and Mismanagement - minority shareholders - There was no alternative except liquidation or revival of company through other modes including sale of assets to...

Oppression and Mismanagement - bogus transactions - siphoning of funds - The allegation is an isolated incident and in order to invoke provisions of Oppression and...

Oppression and mismanagement - It is admitted fact that the major portion of the equity shares (2/3rd) are held by the 1st and 3rd petitioners and the 2nd Respondent...

Oppression and mismanagement - reduction in shareholding - illegal transfer and allotment of shares - The NCLAT observed that, the appellants did not fully comply with...

Oppression and mismanagement - member - When the Respondent No.1 being a shareholder with 25% shareholding at the time of incorporation and also being one of the...

Writ appeal against writ petition entertained by the Ld. Single Judge - private parties - mismanagement and oppression of majority shareholders - Material on record...

Refusal to appoint an arbitrator and refer the dispute to the arbitrator - The dispute is with respect to the Share Subscription and Shareholders Agreement which is...

Quick Updates: