Allegation of oppression and mismanagement - The decision of the ...

Companies Law

May 18, 2021

Allegation of oppression and mismanagement - The decision of the majority would prevail in the interest of the Company and its shareholders per se. Therefore, he cannot question such acquisition at this stage and he has questioned the conveyance deed by filing a suit in City Civil Court of Bombay. Further, the only act of oppression of removal of Petitioner as Director is untenable as the post of director remained vacant due to the absence of the Petitioner in several meetings. - Tri

View Source

← Previous Next →

Allegation of oppression and mismanagement - The decision of the ...

Companies Law

May 18, 2021

You may also like:

Oppression and Mismanagement - minority shareholders - There was no alternative except liquidation or revival of company through other modes including sale of assets to...

Oppression and Mismanagement - bogus transactions - siphoning of funds - The allegation is an isolated incident and in order to invoke provisions of Oppression and...

Oppression and Mismanagement - once the Company against which the aforesaid application has been filed by the appellant on the allegation that there is mismanagement in...

Oppression and mismanagement - appellant has no inherent right to continue as Managing Director/Director in the 1st respondent unless he is able to carry the majority...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Validity of the Lease Deed - Doctrine of Res Sub-Judice - Appellants argued that the Tribunal overstepped its jurisdiction by setting...

Oppression and mismanagement - removal of the Petitioner from the Directorship - the instant Company Petition is maintainable U/s.241 of the Companies Act, 2013, and the...

Binding Judgement of Lager Bench / Majority decision - strength of the Bench - In view of Article 145(5) of the Constitution of India concurrence of a majority of the...

Oppression and mismanagement - the Tribunal has the power to make Interim Orders which it thinks fit for regulation of the conduct of the affairs of the Company -...

Oppression and Mismanagement - This ‘Tribunal’ keeping in mind of the ingredients of Section 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 comes to a resultant conclusion that...

Oppression and mismanagement - Removal of Director - Period of limitation - Time gap of 5 years - The petition filed by the petitioner is prima facie barred by...

Oppression and mismanagement - Determination of minimum shareholding for filing complain / petition against the company - The ‘onus’, to establish ‘Membership’ is on the...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Transfer of Shares - allotment of shares - Forum Shopping - It is clear that even as on 1998, there was no business conducted by the...

Oppression and Mismanagement - This Appellate Tribunal further finds it surprising that although the Appellants is claiming to hold 94.8% of Share Capital of the 1st...

Winding up order - The Company was non-functional, it had already given its premises on rent and it was the only income of the Company. Therefore, we find that the...

Oppression and mismanagement - The directions are in interest of justice and cannot be faulted with. Under Section 424 of Companies Act 2013 NCLT can regulate procedure...

Quick Updates: