Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) - addition was confirmed by CIT(A) and ...

Case Laws Income Tax

June 15, 2019

Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) - addition was confirmed by CIT(A) and ITAT, Thus, there is no dispute with regard to the concealment of income and furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income - If there is no variance between the charge levied at the time of initiation of penalty proceedings and the charge levied at the time of imposition of penalty then no fault can be found with regard to defect in notice so as to hold that the penalty is not leviable

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) - addition was confirmed by CIT(A) and ...

Case Laws Income Tax

June 15, 2019

You may also like:

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty levied u/ss 271(1)(c) and 271AAA for unexplained investment and addition made by adopting net profit as per the books of accounts at 12.85% on the suppressed...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) involved an addition based on estimation by the Assessing Officer, which was later re-estimated by the CIT(A) to disallow 10% of the...

Penalty for concealment of income Under Section 271(1) (c) - Article

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

The crux pertains to levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged furnishing of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income regarding capital gains computation on sale...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - there is concealment of income from the HUF, i.e., knowingly the assessee furnished inaccurate particulars of income for computation...

MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

The ITAT Mumbai ruled on penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for estimation of income on bogus purchases. The tribunal held that penalty cannot be levied on additions made on an...

Voluntary surrender of income by assessee cannot be considered concealment. AO failed to prove concealment, merely concluded voluntary surrender as concealment....

Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act is leviable to be imposed only where the assessee has concealed its particulars of income or furnished...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income was declared in survey u/s 133A - date of filing of return u/s 139(1) had not expired - The fact of “concealment of income” and...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

Quick Updates: