Oppression and mismanagement - the Company has not undertaken ...

Companies Law

November 7, 2019

Oppression and mismanagement - the Company has not undertaken any substantial business from the date of its incorporation and there is a need to put it in motion, the reason for which the Company was envisaged. The dispute between the parties has paralysed the Administration and ordinary business of the Company.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Oppression and mismanagement - the Company has not undertaken ...

Companies Law

November 7, 2019

You may also like:

Oppression and mismanagement - Determination of minimum shareholding for filing complain / petition against the company - The ‘onus’, to establish ‘Membership’ is on the...

Oppression and Mismanagement - once the Company against which the aforesaid application has been filed by the appellant on the allegation that there is mismanagement in...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Transfer of Shares - allotment of shares - Forum Shopping - It is clear that even as on 1998, there was no business conducted by the...

Oppression and Mismanagement - minority shareholders - There was no alternative except liquidation or revival of company through other modes including sale of assets to...

Winding up order - The Company was non-functional, it had already given its premises on rent and it was the only income of the Company. Therefore, we find that the...

Sale of property of the company to the third parties - oppression and mismanagement - it is quite clear that the even though the sales made in the years 2013 and 2014...

Oppression and mismanagement - misappropriation of funds - as such no irregularities were found in convening an Extra-Ordinary General Meeting which was requisitioned at...

Oppression and mismanagement - the Tribunal has the power to make Interim Orders which it thinks fit for regulation of the conduct of the affairs of the Company -...

Oppression and Mismanagement - This ‘Tribunal’ keeping in mind of the ingredients of Section 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 comes to a resultant conclusion that...

Oppression and mismanagement - Removal of Director - Period of limitation - Time gap of 5 years - The petition filed by the petitioner is prima facie barred by...

Continuation of petition for Oppression and Mismanagement by the legal heir of deceased petitioner - the son can hardly maintain the company petition which is filed by...

Oppression and mismanagement - appellant has no inherent right to continue as Managing Director/Director in the 1st respondent unless he is able to carry the majority...

Oppression and mismanagement - not permitted/given sufficient opportunity to be involved in the affairs/board meetings - allotment of shares at par without premium to...

Oppression and mismanagement - Theft of documents - use of (such) documents in judicial proceedings is to substantiate their case namely, “oppression and mismanagement”...

Maintainability of petition before NCLT - oppression and mismanagement - contentions in application u/s 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and the contentions in...

Quick Updates: