Levy of Penalty - Perusal of Rule 26 makes it abundantly clear ...

Case Laws Central Excise

June 22, 2021

Levy of Penalty - Perusal of Rule 26 makes it abundantly clear that unless and until there is sufficient evidence about the mens area/ intent on the part of the appellant which prove that he knew or had reason to believe that excisable goods with which he is involved, he is transporting, removing, depositing, keeping, concealing, selling or purchasing, or in any other manner dealing with such excisable goods, are liable for confiscation, he cannot be penalised under Rule 26. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of Penalty - Perusal of Rule 26 makes it abundantly clear ...

Case Laws Central Excise

June 22, 2021

You may also like:

Compounding of offence - Unless and until a reference is made to the Tribunal, unless and until the Tribunal declares contravention of requirements of Schedule XIII and...

Penalty levied under 271(1)(c) - The revenue has tried to make out a case that since the addition was made pursuant to information from sales tax department, this...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

Levy of penalty on Custodian - providing Inland transportation of containers - CONCOR - As per section 45, the custodian is burdened with the responsibility of safe...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the appellant, during reassessment proceedings, had filed their return of income but failed to provide...

Clandestine Removal - Levy of penalty - If on the basis of the evidences adduced which would be of the nature as enumerated at (ii) of para 40 of the said decision, the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has given sufficient explanation though not found satisfactory by AO - No merit in levying penalty.

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of provisions u/s 269SS - cash receipt claimed as advance against sales - recording of the satisfaction by the AO is sine qua non for...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The finding of the authorities based on the evidence of the valuer, which was corroborated by the circumstantial evidence - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Violation of principles of natural justice - Thus, it is clear that by means of the last so-called III Opportunity of hearing, the petitioner was granted only a short...

Confiscation of the gold bars - remelted gold of foreign origin or not - The admissibility and weight of retracted statements - The Tribunal found that the appellants...

Penalty u/s 27(1)(c) - addition u/s 68/69 for cash deposit in bank account - penalty has been initiated on the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars, but Ld.AO...

Levy of penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - penalty has been levied on the amount of undisclosed income without providing any working of maximum and minimum penalty leviable - No penalty - AT

Principles of Natural Justice - Levy of Penalty - It is no doubt true that there is no right of cross-examination if sufficient corroborative evidence exists, but in the...

Quick Updates: