Revision u/s 263 - The argument of the petitioner that the ...

Income Tax

May 27, 2022

Revision u/s 263 - The argument of the petitioner that the assessment order was not prejudicial to the interest of revenue and therefore the proceeding under Section 263 was liable to be quashed cannot be countenanced. A proceeding under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be scuttled. Further, the petitioner participated in the proceeding initiated under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Therefore, it is not open to the petitioner to turn around to state that the proceeding was without jurisdiction. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - The argument of the petitioner that the ...

Income Tax

May 27, 2022

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest of revenue has to be read in conjunction with an erroneous order passed by the A.O. Every loss of...

Revision u/s 263 - valuation of closing stock, non increasing of closing stock by proportionate other direct expenses - The alleged under valuation of closing stock is a...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - We find that the assessment order qua the deduction under section 80(9)(2)(d) of the Act on account of interest earned from Surat Co-operative...

Revision u.s 263 - assessment order passed pursuant to the revisionary order has resulted in reduction of tax liability - not prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue...

Revision u/s 263 - any loss of revenue as a consequence of an order passed by the Assessing Officer cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of revenue - AT

Validity of revision proceedings u/s 263 - Adoption of either of view by AO - allowability under section 36(1)(viia) - The court concludes that the original assessment...

Revision u/s 263 - As per CIT, AO has not examined the issue of interest expenditure claimed against interest from third party - The Tribunal observed that the...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Jurisdiction exercised by ld PCIT under section 263 of the Act is not in accordance with law. PCIT has selected the item (share capital and...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Addition of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - AO has deemed it fit and proper to treat the cash deposits as the business receipts of the...

Revision u/s 263 - Every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, for example, when an...

Revision u/s 263 - CIT setting aside the second reassessment order - time limit to take action u/s 263 - the necessity for the Commissioner to have substantial grounds...

Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposit during the demonization period - The tribunal noted that the AO had conducted an adequate inquiry into the assessee's cash...

Revision u/s 263 - Invocation of revision proceedings for the second time - As pertinent to point out that there was no bar on limitation by the ld. PCIT to invoke...

Revision u/s 263 - Method of revenue recognition (project completion vs. percentage completion method), and the allocation of interest and Transferable Development...

Revision u/s 263 - The expression prejudicial to the interest of the revenue is of wide import and is not confined to merely loss of tax. - The term erroneous means a...

Quick Updates: