Levy of penalty u/r 26(1) for abatement - it is clear that all ...

Central Excise

March 25, 2023

Levy of penalty u/r 26(1) for abatement - it is clear that all the appellants were indulged in abating the manufacturer for fraudulent availment of Cenvat credit therefore, they have made themselves liable for penalty under Rule 26(1) Cenvat credit rules 2002 - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/r 26(1) for abatement - it is clear that all ...

Central Excise

March 25, 2023

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/r 26 - Personal penalty for abatement in evasion of duty - a plain reading of Rule 26 indicates that imposition of the penalty therein is not tied to a...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Levy of penalty u/s 25(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - evasion of duty - The imposition of penalty on both the appellants is un-called for - since Appellant No.1,...

Levy of penalty Rule 26 of Central Excise Act, 2002 - charge of abatement in the offence of fraudulent availment of cenvat credit - All the appellant having direct and...

Levy of Penalty u/r 26 of CER on the buyer / purchaser of goods - The Revenue has not brought on record as to the role of the appellant in the non-payment of Excise Duty...

Levy of personal penalty of Rs. 10 lacs u/r 26 of CER, on appellant being DGM-Finance of the company - The appellant being worked as DGM Finance ultimately all the...

Penalty - Bogus invoice issued without selling the goods – penalty would be attracted under Rule 25 (1) (d) as well as Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - AT

Levy of penalty - the penalty under Section 26 is inextricably linked to the confiscation of goods as long as there is no confiscation of the goods ordered that there...

Penalty u/r 26(1) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - charge of abating the evasion of duty by the Main Party - The appellant argued that since the main party's case of duty...

Penalty under Rule 26(1) of Central excise rules 2002 - Bogus Cenvatable invoices issued - the appellant was liable to pay penalty - AT

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

Levy of penalty on Proprietor of the Firm under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - Taking note of the fact that penalty...

Levy of penalty under Rule 25 cannot be imposed upon the main appellant for goods not manufactured by him - however penalty on director under Rule 26 confirmed - AT

MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

Quick Updates: