Refund claim - payments made under protest - Time Limitation - ...

Service Tax

May 3, 2023

Refund claim - payments made under protest - Time Limitation - the Appellant had challenged the levy of duty and therefore, any payments made are deemed to be made under protest. His challenge against the demand was decided in favour of the Appellant which resulted in the refund claim - the refund claims filed by the Appellant is allowed. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - payments made under protest - Time Limitation - ...

Service Tax

May 3, 2023

You may also like:

Refund claim - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - Time bar - benefit of ‘payment of duty under protest’ made by the manufacturer cannot be extended to the buyer - AT

Refund claim rejected as time bared - the amount deposited by the appellant during the investigation can never be construed as a duty - it is held as deposited under...

Refund claim for the amount of CVD paid - time limitation - Duty was paid under protest or not - The appellant, an importer of silk yarn and silk fabrics, filed a refund...

Rejection of Refund Claim - denial of refund on the ground that the assessment of Bill of Entry has not been challenged by the appellant by filing appeal before...

Refund claim - Unjust enrichment - price inclusive of duty of excise - maintaining uniformity of price - duty paid under protest - refund allowed - HC

Refund of cenvat credit - Duty under protest - closer of factory - Rule 5 in no way prohibits the payment of the refund amount in cash - HC

Claim of refund of excess duty of customs paid - exemption from customs duty - assessee has not challenged the assessment before any appellate Forum - refund allowed - AT

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Refund of Customs Duty - duty paid under protest - The appellant themselves has lodged a protest during the pendency of the appeal which is also taken on record - No...

Denial of refund claim - period of limitation - if the appellant was disputing the levy of duty and was agitating that no duty was payable and that payment was being...

Quick Updates: