Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2023 Year 2023 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee preferred a claim which was not ...

Income Tax

August 28, 2023

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee preferred a claim which was not acceptable to the Revenue - threat of penalty cannot become a gag and/or haunt an assessee for making a claim which may be erroneous or wrong, when it is made during the course of the assessment proceedings - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because assessee claimed depreciation at 25% treating items to be plant, which claim was not acceptable to revenue, would not by itself...

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee had sold a plot of land in respect of which deduction u/s 54B claimed - withdrawal of deduction u/s 54B - merely because the assessee...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Revenue expenditure or not - expenses on NPA’s - merely because the assessee has claimed the expenditure, which claim was not accepted or not...

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - wrong claim of set off loss - explanation was not found false - no iota of evidence of concealment of any fact relating to particulars of income...

  6. Merely because assessee had claimed expenditure which was not accepted or not acceptable to Revenue that by itself would not attract a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

  7. Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - What is clear is that the assessee has disclosed necessary facts in relation to various expenses including expenditure relatable to...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non specification of charge - defective notice - Merely because the assessee claimed the expenditure by virtue of a change of head of income and...

  9. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The Revenue argued that the assessee's actions constituted furnishing inaccurate particulars of income or concealing income. However, the High...

  10. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 35 - AO has not brought out his case as to why penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act...

  11. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - A mere making of the claim, which is not sustainable in law, by itself, will not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars regarding the income...

  12. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the claim of the assessee was found to be false claim and explanations offered by the assessee were found by the Revenue to be false and clearly...

  13. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) claimed in the original return and later in the return filed in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act,...

  14. Penalty u/s 271(1) - addition of wrong claim u/s 80IB made by assessee in the return & surrendered during scrutiny proceedings - such claim is solely based on the report...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Explanation is bonafide is, we find, supported by the fact that during assessment proceedings the assessee, realizing his mistake even before...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates