Revision u/s 263 - Not only the Pr. CIT had on the basis of a ...

Income Tax

April 2, 2022

Revision u/s 263 - Not only the Pr. CIT had on the basis of a misconceived reading of the position of law directed the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings in the case of the assessee u/s 271AAB of the Act, but he had also exceeded his jurisdiction while issuing such directions. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - Not only the Pr. CIT had on the basis of a ...

Income Tax

April 2, 2022

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - CIT has merely directed the Assessing Officer to make an elaborate inquiry. - revision is not valid - AT

Revision u/s 263 - addition u/s 68 - The Assessing Officer has taken a possible view. When the Assessing Officer follows the direction of the Ld. Pr. CIT, in his order...

Revision u/s 263 - the ld PCIT had invoked revision jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act on the very same point of allowability of LTCL. Hence it could be safely concluded...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - receipt of share premium - the power of revision u/s 263 does not allow for supplanting or substituting the view of the Assessing Officer. The...

Revision u/s 263 - Characterization of income - Real estate business - Assessing Officer has conducted sufficient enquiry as required under Explanation 2(a) to Section...

Revision u/s 263 - carry forward of losses on sale of shares - where there are two possible views and the Assessing Officer has taken one of the possible views, no...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - sale of impugned land measuring 10.162 acres below the stamp duty value - under the given circumstances, it can be safely concluded that the...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Jurisdiction exercised by ld PCIT under section 263 of the Act is not in accordance with law. PCIT has selected the item (share capital and...

Validity of Revision u/s 263 - Whether inquiry or verification was not made by the Assessing Officer - Appellant, Revenue, is not in a position to point out as to what...

Revision u/s 263 - PCIT is incorrect in coming to the conclusion that Assessing Officer has not examined the issue and applied his mind insofar as investments in fixed...

Revision u/sec. 263 - CIT has exceeded his jurisdiction in directing the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

Revision u/s 263 - Validity of proceedings – CIT has no jurisdiction to direct the Assessing Officer to initiate proceedings u/s 201(1A) - AT

Revision u/s 263 - Jurisdiction of AO - There was no change of jurisdiction sought by the Revenue as per Section 124 read with Section 120 of the Income Tax Act, 1961....

Revision u/s 263 - PCIT has come to conclusion that the order passed by AO is erroneous, but has not verified nor investigated to determine the other condition i.e. how...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - an order which is prejudicial to the interests of the revenue - As far as adequacy of inquiry is considered, there is no law which provides the...

Quick Updates: