Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2008 (8) TMI 875

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tral. The controversies involved in these revisions are interconnected and interwoven and as was suggested by the learned counsel for the parties are being disposed of by a common judgment. The applicant who is engaged in the business of foodgrains, galla, tilhan, bardana, kirana, gur, rab, posta dana and oil cake, etc., applied for and was granted registration under section 8A of the Act and under section 7 of the Central Sales Tax Act. The registration was granted on March 22, 1999 and a security of Rs. 15,000 of two registered dealers under the Act was furnished as demanded by the Department. The returns of the turnover were filed regularly and the admitted tax was paid promptly as alleged by the applicant. The applicant has a head offi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the provisions of the Act? (ii) Whether additional security could be demanded where none of the conditions prescribed under the Acts was present or alleged? (iii) Whether additional security demanded is disproportionate to the tax payable? (iv) Whether any additional security could be demanded without issuance of the show-cause notice? (v) Whether the Tribunal could take into consideration any ground or reason which was not considered by the lower authorities?" Shri S.D. Singh, the learned counsel appearing for the dealer, submits that on the plain language of section 8C, there was no occasion for the Department to demand any additional security as otherwise it would amount to violation of the right of the dealer to carry on free trade .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rty. He is an original resident of the district of Bareilly and has declared its head office at Kayamganj and has therefrom carried on the transactions worth only Rs. 10,000 till the passing of the order demanding additional security. It is also not in dispute that he has got a branch at Bareilly from where he has disclosed the taxable turnover at Rs. 13,12,740.27. On these admitted facts a question arises as to whether the demand of additional security is at all justified or not. Section 8C of the Act provides for security in the interest of the Revenue. Sub-section (2) thereof provides where it appears necessary to the assessing authority for proper realization of any tax, penalty or other such dues payable under the Act, it may demand a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hority on the turnover of the dealer for the assessment year in which such security is required to be furnished. Coming to the facts of the present case, it is not the case of the dealer-opposite party that abruptly the turnover for the month of July 1999 was increased abnormally as a windfall. The circumstances which have been taken into consideration by the assessing officer such as that the dealer has no property at Farrukhabad wherein he is carrying on the business, that the turnover disclosed at Farrukhabad is very nominal and that the turnover disclosed at its branch at Bareilly is very high, cannot be said to be irrelevant or irrational for demanding the additional security. The learned counsel, then, submits that section 8C is not .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ned counsel that the additional security amount may be reduced to that figure, at least. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and taking into consideration the fact that the applicant is not a resident of Farrukhabad, the interest of justice would be sub-served if the applicant is required to furnish the additional securities of two registered dealers of Rs. 3 lakhs instead of Rs. 5 lakhs. In other respects the order demanding the additional security remains intact. Six weeks time is granted to furnish the additional security from the date of order. So far as the connected revisions are concerned they are directed against the order cancelling the registration due to failure of filing of the additional security. If the applic .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates