Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2002 (12) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2002 (12) TMI 340 - CEGAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......orm to Note 6 to Heading 84.82. It had been specifically declared that ldquo the maximum and minimum diameters differ more than 1 or by more than 0.05 mm rdquo . The test report has revealed that these statements were deliberate misstatements. 8. emsp In view of what has been stated above, we find no merit in the appeal. It is accordingly rejected.
|