Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2014 (11) TMI 987 - AT - Income TaxFailure to obtain permission before incurring expenditure u/s 34(2AB) and 35(2AB) - Held that - If the section 35(2AB)(1) is analyzed then the deduction shall be allowed of a sum equal to two times of the expenditure so incurred and the prescribed authority is to submit its report of such approval/facility to the Director General on a prescribed form within specified time meaning thereby the authority concerned has to submit the report to the Director General. However if the totality of facts are analyzed as mentioned earlier the assessee made application for such approval on 11/12/2007 with the prescribed authority and such approval was granted on 04/03/2009 therefore the assessee cannot be denied the claimed deduction u/s 35(2AB) of the Act merely on the ground that the prescribed authority did not submit form no. 3CL in time to the Income-tax Department. The assessee cannot be penalized for the fault if any of the Department. The Assessing Officer cannot be expected to be too technical rather is to take practical approach under the facts narrated hereinabove because it was beyond the control of the assessee to direct the authority to submit the prescribed form on Form no.3CL to the Department. Section 35(2AB) of the Act nowhere suggest that the date of approval of research and development facility will be cut off date for eligibility of weighted deduction under this section on expenses incurred from that date onwards; Once facility is approved entire expenditure so incurred on development of research and development facility has to be allowed for such weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB) of the Act and thus it would be sufficient to hold that assessee has fulfilled the conditions as laid down in the section. - Decided against Revenue.
|