Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2011 (8) TMI 1101 - HC - Income TaxBogus purchases - Held that - There was evidence on record to suggest that though purchases may not have been made from M/s. Shreenathji Industries as initially suggested by the assessee in the books of account nevertheless the factum of actual purchases was placed for verification by the assessee before the authorities. In fact assessee s assertion appears to have been that purchases had to be made from other parties who were not reflecting such sales in their account for saving taxes such as incometax sales tax etc. Be that as it may we see no material distinction in facts involved in the present case and in case of Sanjay Oilcake Industries (2008 (3) TMI 323 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT). It is true that the Delhi High Court treated the issue somewhat differently. However when the decision of our Court lays down certain ratio in the absence of any special reason to differ we would have to follow the same. Other issues are consequent in nature. As already recorded CIT (Appeals) had addressed the issue of applicability of section 40A(3) of the Act. Under the circumstances though it is true that the Tribunal did not separately discus this issue only for that reason we see no reasons to interfere.
|