Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2015 (5) TMI 1067 - HC - VAT and Sales TaxAssessment under the Luxury Tax Act - banquet sales bills - Rule 3C brought into rules as per SRO 566/2006 dated 28/07/2006 which prescribes procedure for computation of rent or other charges realized for hall auditorium Kalyanamandapam etc. where such rent or other charges are not separately ascertainable - whether Rule 3C of the Rules which was introduced only subsequent to the year of assessment i.e. 2005-06 Rule 3C procedure can be relied on for determination of luxury tax? - Held that - Merely because there is no definite procedure as contemplated under Rule 3C for determination of luxury tax in the year 2005 it does not divest the petitioner from any liability to pay luxury tax in the light of non obstante clause under Section 4(2) of the Act. Though Rule 3C would not apply its yardstick can be applied to arrive at as a best judgment - no infirmity with the calculation of the luxury tax. Whether the petitioner is entitled for credit of the payment already made for the entire amount towards sales tax? - since the petitioner has already paid VAT on full value on banquet sales excess VAT paid has to be set off against luxury tax payable. Fresh assessment shall be made after giving credit to the excess VAT paid. Petition disposed off - decided in favor of petitioner.
|