Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2012 (2) TMI 643 - SC - Indian LawsPrinciple of failure of justice - Effect on not committing an accused in terms of Section 193 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (the Code) in cases where charge-sheet is filed u/s 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 (the Act) and cognizance is directly taken by the Special Judge under the Act - In the instant case neither the Trial Court nor the High Court appears to have kept in view the requirements of sub-section (3) relating to question regarding failure of justice . Merely because there is any omission error or irregularity in the matter of according sanction that does not affect the validity of the proceeding unless the Court records the satisfaction that such error omission or irregularity has resulted in failure of justice. The same also applies to the appellate or revisional Court. The requirement of sub- section (4) about raising the issue at the earliest stage has not been also considered. Unfortunately the High Court by a practically non-reasoned order confirmed the order passed by the learned trial judge. The orders are therefore indefensible. We set aside the said orders. It would be appropriate to require the trial Court to record findings in terms of Clause (b) of Sub-section (3) and Sub-section (4) of Section 19. Per incuriam are those decisions given in ignorance or forgetfulness of some inconsistent statutory provision or of some authority binding on the court concerned so that in such cases some part of the decision or some step in the reasoning on which it is based is found on that account to be demonstrably wrong. Incuria literally means carelessness . In practice per incuriam appears to mean per ignoratium . English courts have developed this principle in relaxation of the rule of stare decisis . The quotable in law is avoided and ignored if it is rendered in ignoratium of a statute or other binding authority HELD THAT - No objection was raised at the time of framing of charge or any other relevant time but only propounded after conviction. Under these circumstances the right of the collective as well as the right of the victim springs to the forefront and then it becomes obligatory on the part of the accused to satisfy the court that there has been failure of justice or prejudice has been caused to him. we come to the irresistible conclusion that the objection relating to non-compliance of Section 193 of the Code which eventually has resulted in directly entertaining and taking cognizance by the Special Judge under the (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 does not vitiate the trial and on the said ground alone the conviction cannot be set aside or there cannot be a direction of retrial and therefore the decision rendered in Bhooraji 2001 (8) TMI 1385 - SUPREME COURT lays down the correct law inasmuch as there is no failure of justice or no prejudice is caused to the accused. The decisions rendered in Moly and Vidyadharan 2004 (3) TMI 767 - SUPREME COURT have not noted the decision in Bhooraji a binding precedent and hence they are per incuriam and further the law laid down therein whereby the conviction is set aside or matter is remanded after setting aside the conviction for fresh trial does not expound the correct proposition of law and accordingly they are hereby to that extent overruled. if the failure of justice is not bestowed its due signification in a case of the present nature every procedural lapse or interdict would be given a privileged place on the pulpit. It would with unnecessary interpretative dynamism have the effect potentiality to cause a dent in the criminal justice delivery system and eventually justice would become illusory like a mirage. It is to be borne in mind that the Legislature deliberately obliterated certain rights conferred on the accused at the committal stage under the new Code. The intendment of the Legislature in the plainest sense is that every stage is not to be treated as vital and it is to be interpreted to subserve the substantive objects of the criminal trial.
|