2011 (1) TMI 68 - AT - Income Tax

Arm s length price - The assessee did not charge any interest on overdue payments - After a period of time of normally 30 days would be the expected normal arm s length price - The quantification of notional interest was done by adopting interest at 2.19 % LIBOR on overdue amount beyond 30 days - A continuing debit balance in our humble understanding is not an international transaction per se but is a result of the international transaction - What can be examined on the touchstone of arm s length principles is the commercial transaction itself as a result of which the debit balance has come into existence and the terms and conditions including terms of payment on which the said commercial transaction has been entered into - It appears that the TPO has adopted interest @ 2.19% LIBOR on balances which exceed 30 days but LIBOR rate is relevant only in the case of lending or borrowing of funds and not in the case of commercial overdues Held that the impugned addition of Rs. 12, 51, 175 is unsustainable in law Appeal is allowed

Issues Involved:
1. Arm's length price (ALP) adjustment in respect of interest not charged on debit balances overdue beyond thirty days of associated enterprises.

Analysis:
The judgment revolves around the issue of whether the Commissioner (Appeals) was justified in upholding an arm's length price adjustment concerning interest not charged on overdue debit balances of the assessee's associated enterprises. The case involved international transactions with an associated enterprise, where the assessee did not charge interest on overdue payments. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) made an ALP adjustment of Rs 12,51,175, quantified by adopting interest at 2.19% LIBOR on overdue amounts beyond 30 days. The assessee contended that not charging interest was consistent with its practices. The Tribunal analyzed the concept of 'international transaction' under Section 92B, emphasizing that ALP adjustments can only be made in respect of such transactions. The Tribunal concluded that a continuing debit balance is not an international transaction per se but a result of the transaction, and not charging interest on overdue balances should have been compared with cases where interest was charged on overdue balances with independent enterprises. The Tribunal held that the impugned addition of Rs 12,51,175 was unsustainable, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the adjustment.

In the detailed analysis, the Tribunal highlighted that any income from an international transaction must be computed based on the arm's length price, including expenses or interest arising from such transactions. The definition of 'international transaction' includes transactions between associated enterprises having a bearing on profits, incomes, losses, or assets. The Tribunal clarified that a continuing debit balance is not an independent transaction but a reflection of delayed payment, influenced by various factors including normal business practices. The Tribunal emphasized that the terms of payment in a commercial transaction are crucial, and the impact on profits or assets must be demonstrated to justify ALP adjustments. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the TPO's approach of applying LIBOR rates on overdue balances was incorrect as LIBOR is relevant to lending or borrowing, not commercial overdues. The Tribunal also highlighted the necessity of comparing cases where interest was charged on overdue balances to determine ALP adjustments accurately.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the ALP adjustment was unsustainable, and directed the deletion of the adjustment. The judgment provides a detailed analysis of the concept of international transactions, arm's length pricing, and the necessity of demonstrating the impact on profits or assets to justify ALP adjustments accurately.

← Previous Next →