9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Justification of the Tribunal in deleting Rs. 3,13,014 as income from other sources. 2. Deductibility of interest earned as income from other sources towards the construction of the factory. Summary: Issue 1: Justification of the Tribunal in Deleting Rs. 3,13,014 as Income from Other Sources The High Court examined whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting Rs. 3,13,014 as income from other sources. The assessee, a limited company, had deposited surplus money from over-subscribed shares in banks and with a steel supplier, earning a total interest of Rs. 3,18,014. The Income-tax Officer (ITO) treated this interest as income from other sources and allowed a deduction of Rs. 5,000, determining the taxable income at Rs. 3,13,014. The Tribunal, however, found that the company had not commenced business and was still constructing its plant. It held that the interest earned was appropriated against the cost of construction and thus should not be taxed in isolation. The High Court disagreed, stating that the bank interest is "income from other sources" u/s 56 of the Act and must be taxed accordingly. The court emphasized that the application of income towards construction does not exempt it from tax. Issue 2: Deductibility of Interest Earned as Income from Other Sources Towards Construction The court also addressed whether the interest earned, taxable as income from other sources, is subject to deduction towards the construction of the factory. U/s 57(iii) of the Act, deductions from income chargeable under the head "Income from other sources" are permissible only if the expenditure is not capital in nature and is incurred wholly and exclusively for earning such income. The court found that the interest paid on borrowings for construction was not incurred to earn the bank interest and thus did not qualify for deduction u/s 57(iii). The court further noted that the application of interest income towards construction does not affect its taxability. The court referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Challapalli Sugars Ltd. v. CIT, which held that interest paid on borrowings for asset acquisition before production commencement is capital expenditure and not deductible. Conclusion: The High Court answered both questions in the negative, against the assessee and in favor of the Department. The court held that the interest earned is taxable as income from other sources and no deduction is allowable for interest paid on borrowings for construction. The Tribunal's approach, based on accounting and commercial practices, was found inconsistent with the legal principles of the Act. The court directed the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench, to pass appropriate orders in terms of section 260 of the Act.
|
