Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2015 (1) TMI 842 - HC - Central ExciseSSI Exemption Brand name of another Lawful consent and assignment exemption under notification not apply to the specified goods bearing a brand name or trade name whether registered or not of another person except in the cases specified - appellants case does not fall in any of the exceptions High Court dismissed the case for want of prosecution 2010 (3) TMI 710 - CESTAT NEW DELHI - filed by the Revenue against the order of Tribunal 2010 (3) TMI 710 - CESTAT NEW DELHI wherein Tribunal held that existence of assignment cannot justify the benefit of the notification.
|