Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2016 (1) TMI 844 - AT - Central ExciseCenvat Credit - Genuineness of the transaction not proved - Held that - The appellant failed to establish through cogent evidences that the materials mentioned in the respective invoices were received and the duty amount mentioned in the said invoices were also paid to the treasury by the input supplier. Now before me also the ld.Advocate for the appellant could not place any of these documents except Xerox copy of one demand draft of Rs. 1.00 Lakh drawn in favour of M/s.Three F-Filters (P) Ltd. dated 08.03.2001 without establishing that this amount related to the inputs purchased from M/s.Three F-Filters (P) Ltd. New Delhi during the relevant period and against the disputed invoices. In absence of evidence to rebut the charges labeled in the demand notice the findings recorded by the authorities below needs no interference. In the result the order of the ld. Commissioner(Appeals) is upheld and the Appeal is rejected. - Decided against assessee.
|