Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2016 (2) TMI 636 - AT - Central ExciseAbatement claim rejected - procedure lapses on which the abatement was rejected are as the appellant failed to declare closing balance of stock intimation for resumption of production was filed belatedly on 17-01-2000 whereas the production was resumed on 15-01-2000 and failure to declaration continuous closer period - Held that - All the above lapse are the minor procedure lapse on that basis abatement could not have been rejected. As regard the lapse of non-declaring the closing stock we agree with the appellant that the closing stock is otherwise recorded and available in the stock account i.e. RG-1 register. It is also declared in monthly returns and both these records are statutory records. Therefore though the appellant did not declare the closing stock specifically the same stands complied with as the same was declared in the RG-1 and monthly returns. Appellant s production was resumed on 15-1-2000 however the intimation was filed on 17-1-2000 it is observed that 15th and 16th being Saturday and Sunday were holidays. Therefore filing of intimation on 17-1-2000 cannot be treated as belated in terms of provision of General Clauses Act accordingly to which any act to be done on a particular date and if any holiday falls on that date the next working day shall be treated as date within the period prescribed. Therefore there is no delay on the part of the appellant in filing the intimation on 17-01-2000. Regarding non-declaration of continuous closing period it is a minor lapse as from the intimation date of the closure and date of resumption of production the period of closure can be easily ascertained. Therefore it cannot be said the period of closure is not in the knowledge of the department.- Decided in favour of assessee
|