Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2019 (2) TMI 1880 - HC - Companies LawDisqualification of Directors - validity of list published by the Registrar of the Companies naming the directors of the companies who have attracted disqualification under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act 2013 - HELD THAT - Even a bare perusal of the impugned order reveals that no rights of the parties have been decided by the learned Single Judge and the matter has been directed to be heard finally upon exchange of affidavits. There is no plausible or justifiable reason as to why we should interfere in this matter. In an Intra-Court Mandamus Appeal no interference is usually warranted unless palpable infirmities or perversity are noticed on a plain reading of the impugned order. In the facts of the instant case we do not notice any such palpable infirmity or perversity on a plain reading of the impugned order. The appeal is thoroughly devoid of any merit and is liable to be dismissed along with the application for stay and stands accordingly dismissed.
|