Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2020 (1) TMI 1591 - AT - Income TaxTP Adjustment - adjustment on account of AMP expenses in manufacturing segment - HELD THAT - ITAT has decided the issue in favour of the assessee as in assessee own case 2019 (3) TMI 459 - ITAT MUMBAI wherein held revenue had failed to discharge the onus that was cast upon it as regards proving that there was any understanding or an arrangement or action in concert as per which the assessee had agreed for incurring of AMP expenses for brand building of its AE viz. L Oreal S.A. France the TP adjustment in respect of AMP expenses cannot be sustained and is liable to be vacated. AMP adjustment of distribution segment of international transaction of import of finished goods - The aforesaid adjustment was carried out by the TPO as per the adjusted RPM in order to align the functions assets and risks profile of the assessee with that of the comparable companies. As the revenue had failed to establish the existence of any understanding or an arrangement or action in concert as per which the assessee had agreed for incurring of AMP expenses for brand building of its AE viz. L Oreal S.A. France therefore the AMP expenses incurred by the assessee had been held by us as not having been incurred by the assessee for brand building of its AE. Accordingly as no part of the AMP expenses are attributable to rendering of any DEMPE functions for the brands owned by the AE therefore the TP adjustment made by the TPO in respect of the distribution segment of the assessee on account of alleged differences in intensity of AMP functions performed by the assessee vis-a-vis the comparable companies in order to align the functions assets and risks profile of the assessee with that of the comparable companies cannot be sustained and are liable to be vacated. Alternative adjustment on the manufacturing segment - international transaction on account of payment for availing of marketing support services to AEs - In this case the emails provided by the assessee are not supported any with documentary evidence such as cost allocation sheet confirmation from parties and the assessee has not demonstrated the benefit provided by the AE from the services. Accordingly the ALP is taken at NIL and the arm s length value of payment made towards availing the said consulting services is considered as NIL. However it is important to note that the said services are forming part of the AMP adjustment done by the undersigned above. Accordingly it would only be fair to consider this adjustment as an alternative adjustment and to be considered only if the primary adjustment of AMP spend is not upheld by the appellate authorities. Benefit aspect u/s. 37(1) - As per TPO has not examined whether the method adopted by the assessee to determine the ALP is correct or not but instead concluded that the payment are excessive - We note that the reference to the excessive nature/benefit derived by the assessee by the TPO is not at all sustainable in the light of Hon ble Jurisdictional High Court decision in the case of Lever India Exports Ltd. (supra). In the said decision it was expounded by Hon ble Jurisdictional High Court that it is not for the TPO to apply benefit test. Hence this limb of TPO s reasoning is not sustainable. Further it is clear that the assessee has submitted enormous additional evidence before the DRP and they have been remanded to the TPO also. The TPO has not made any adverse comment rather he has again reiterated that expenses are excessive and has justification aspect in third party situation. In other words TPO s has again reiterated the issue of benefit test which has been held by Hon ble Jurisdictional High Court to be not applied by TPO in his adjudication. Transfer pricing adjustment at nil fails on both counts. Firstly on the account of benefit test which is not to be applied by the TPO and secondly none of the method of benchmarking the international transaction as specified in section 92C has been applied. Furthermore as rightly contended by the learned counsel of the assessee the ITAT in earlier year had remanded the issue as the issue of additional evidences was there However ITAT was in principle of the view that application of benefit test by the TPO is not at all sustainable on the touchstone of honourable jurisdictional High Court decision in the case of Lever India Exports Ltd. 2017 (2) TMI 120 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT In the present case we note that detailed evidences has been submitted before the DRP and the same have been examined by the TPO in remand proceedings who has reiterated his reservations on the need and benefit to the assessee instead of applying any method of determining the arms length price - we direct that these alternative adjustments as above are liable to be deleted. We order accordingly.
|