Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2019 (2) TMI 2060 - HC - VAT and Sales TaxDoctrine of merger - Seeking a direction to the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 9% per annum from August 2006 till the date of its actual refund on the principal amount - HELD THAT - It is not in dispute that the controversy involved in the present case is no longer res integra inasmuch as the same stands decided by the above referred decision of this court in the case of M/s Syngenta Crop Protection Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Gujarat 2018 (4) TMI 1669 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT . In the said case this court relied upon an earlier decision of this court in the case of State of Gujarat v. Doshi Printing Press 2015 (3) TMI 211 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT wherein the court turned down the contention that while giving effect to section 54(1)(aa) of the Act the effect would be available to the assessment made by the assessing authority only and not the further modification made by the first appellate authority or thereafter the second appellate authority or even third appellate authority as the case may be. The court held that the interpretation canvassed by the revenue of section 54(1) (aa) of the Act if accepted would run counter to the basic principles of the doctrine of merger which is a well accepted doctrine incorporated in the system of administration of justice. The refund claim of the assessee therefore cannot be stated to have arisen from an order other than the order of assessment. The court further held that the amounts were recovered from the petitioners only in the month of February 2010 that is long after the VAT Act was brought in force and that the petitioner cannot seek interest on the refund at the rate prescribed under the repealed Gujarat Sales Tax Act merely because the amount involved was in relation to a period when the Gujarat Sales Tax Act was in force. To that extent the petitioner s contention was negatived. The respondents are directed to forthwith pay interest to the petitioner at the rate of 6% per annum from August 2006 till the date of actual refund on the principal amount of Rs.1, 28, 63, 365/- and not later than four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment - Petition allowed.
|