Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2016 (6) TMI 489 - HC - Income TaxRegistration u/s. 12A - whether in view of amended Section 2(15) of the Act restricting the definition charitable purpose by excluding carrying on any trade commerce and business in receipt of an amount in excess of Rs. 25 lakhs would by itself entitle the Director of Income Tax to cancel a Registration under Section 12AA (3) of the Act? - Held that - Circular No.21 of 2016 clearly provides that mere receipts on account of business being in excess of the limits in the proviso would not result in cancellation of Registration granted under Section 12AA of the Act unless there is a change in nature of activities of the institution. Admittedly there is no change in nature of activities of the institution during the subject Assessment Year. The further submission on behalf of the Revenue that looking at the quantum of receipts on account of commercial activities it is unlikely/ improbable that in the subsequent Assessment Years the receipts would fall below Rs. 25 lakhs and therefore the Commissioner is entitled to cancel the Registration. The aforesaid submission made on behalf of the Revenue is based not on facts as existing but on probability of future events. We are unable to accept the submission based on clairvoyance. Further we are unable to understand what prejudice is caused to the Revenue since whenever the receipts on account of commercial activities is in excess of the limits provided in proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act the Assessing Officer is mandated/ required to deny exemption under Section 11 of the Act as provided in Circular No.21 of 2016 dated 27th May 2016. Accordingly the issue stands covered in favour of the Revenue by virtue of Circular No.21 of 2016. In view of the issue being covered by the CBDT Circular No.21 of 2016 no grievance against the impugned order can be made by the Revenue.
|