Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2016 (10) TMI 242 - AT - Service TaxCommission paid to overseas agent - reverse charge - Benefit of Notification No. 18/2009-ST dated 07.07.2009 - Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the demand of service tax is correct under the reverse charge mechanism from the appellant by denying the benefit of Notification No. 18/2009-ST on account of technically lapses - Business Auxiliary Service. Held that - the appellant is receiving service of overseas commission agent and paying commission to the said agent. The benefit of notification has been denied due to reason that the appellant has not produce BRC and have not filed original copy of invoices and the return form the EXP-1 and EXP-2. In fact the basic of requirement of notification has not been disputed by the Revenue therefore substantive benefit cannot be denied on account of technical lapses has held by the Hon ble High Court of Bombay in the case of Union of India Vs. Farheen Texturisers (2010 (7) TMI 982 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT). Further by the Hon ble High Court of Allahabad in the case of J.S. Gupta & Sons (2015 (7) TMI 379 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT) the payment made to the overseas commission agent not in disputed. The appellant has filed all the shipping bills and copy of invoices issued by the overseas agent. These fact has not been disputed by the Revenue. In that circumstance I hold that the appellant has complied with the condition of the notification. Further I observed that the commission paid to the overseas commission agent is less than 1% of the FOB value of the exported goods. Therefore the appellant is entitled for benefit under Notification No. 18/2009-ST. Consequently no service tax can be demanded under the category of Business Auxiliary Services under reverse charge mechanism. Chargeability - Service tax - Whether the activity of loading/unloading by the contractor is chargeable to service tax under the category of Manpower Recruitment Agency Services or not - Held that - the demand of service tax has been confirmed under the category of Manpower Recruitment Agency service for loading goods by the contractor on weight basis. As contractor has entered into agreement with the appellant on weighment basis. In that circumstances the activity of loading/unloading cannot be termed as supply of Manpower Recruitment Agency Service therefore the demand under such category is not sustainable. - Decided in favour of appellant
|