Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2017 (1) TMI 1370 - HC - Income TaxAddition of undisclosed net profit - addition relying upon one piece of paper which was provisional P&L Account subject to further verification of the accounts of entire unit - Held that - It is required to be noted that as such the learned Assessing Officer did not dispute other expenses and/or the amount mentioned in the final P&L account and/or audited account. There was no other material available with the learned Assessing Officer while making addition of Rs. 2, 72, 78, 269/-as undisclosed net profit. The provisional P&L Account was explained by the assessee in detail which has been accepted by the learned CIT(A) as well as the learned Tribunal. We are in complete agreement with the view taken by the learned CIT(A) and the learned Tribunal while deleting the addition of Rs. 2, 72, 78, 269/-made by the learned Assessing Officer as undisclosed net profit. There was no other material available with the learned Assessing Officer while making the addition of Rs. 2, 72, 78, 269/-as undisclosed net profit except one piece of paper / provisional P&L account which was explained by the assessee. Under the circumstances present Tax Appeal deserves to be dismissed qua proposed question No.(1) Addition on account of difference in stock - Held that - As rightly observed by the learned CIT(A) and the learned Tribunal the learned Assessing Officer was justified in neglecting the transactions in between the period. The learned CIT(A) also placed much reliance on the audited accounts. On reconsideration of the stock statement the stock difference was arrived at at Rs. 63, 597/-and therefore the learned CIT(A) rightly restricted the addition made on account of difference in stock to Rs. 63, 597/-. Considering the aforesaid it cannot be said that both the learned CIT(A) and the learned Tribunal have committed any error. The findings recorded by the learned CIT(A) and the learned Tribunal are on appreciation of evidence and the material on record. No substantial question of law arise. We are in complete agreement with the view taken by the learned CIT(A) and the learned Tribunal while restricting the addition to Rs. 63, 597/-on account of difference in stock. Under the circumstances question No.(2) also deserves to be dismissed.
|