Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2017 (3) TMI 162 - HC - CustomsRevocation of CHA licence - the interpretation that the respondent was under an obligation to physically verify the particulars was misplaced - Held that - This Court notices that the CESTAT construed the provisions of Regulation 11 and the Board Circular of 08.04.2010 and found that the partnership firm involved in the import of consignment was an existing concern duly registered under a partnership deed and two existing partners and that its IEC copy PAN Card telephone bill of the firm Voter ID of the partners copy of the partnership deed have been verified by the respondent - appeal dismissed.
|