Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2017 (7) TMI 552 - HC - CustomsNatural justice - it is the case of the petitioner that while the order was passed ex parte after noting that despite the grant of several opportunities to the petitioner the petitioner was not represented at the hearing before the Commissioner - Held that - by Ext.P4 letter of adjournment the petitioner had indicated that he would not be in a position to be represented in the personal hearing on 22.02.2017 and an opportunity was sought for a personal hearing in the month of March 2017. Ext.P5 order passed by the respondent is without reference to the said request for adjournment made by the petitioner. At any rate no prejudice will be caused if a fresh order of adjudication is passed after hearing the petitioner considering that there is no period of limitation that will be breached if a fresh order is passed after hearing the petitioner - appeal allowed by way of remand.
|