Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2017 (9) TMI 439 - AT - CustomsConfiscation - undeclared third country origin goods listed in part A-1 & C of the Inventory valued at Rs. 34, 39, 445/- were brought into India in contravention of the provisions of N/N. 9/96-CUS(NT) dated 22.01.96 issued under Section of the Customs Act read with Section 3 of Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act 1992 - knitted garments declared in the Bill of Entry valued at Rs. 2, 13, 522/- used for concealment of the smuggled TCO goods were liable to confiscation at the same were used for concealing the TCO goods that the undeclared Nepalese garments personal effects and miscellaneous goods (listed in part A2 D & E of the inventory) used for concealment of the smuggled TCO goods were liable to confiscation under Section 111(d) (l) & (m) read with Section 119 of the Customs Act 1962 - case of Revenue is that it appears that the appellants have been trying to make various place by way of cover-up and/or afterthought. Held that - there is no conclusive finding as to the garments seized being of third country origin. So far the goods being undeclared in the Bill of Entry being admitted in Nepalese Jackets its value at Rs. 33, 000/- the declared garments valued at Rs. 32, 74, 945/- at the Annexure-A1 to Panchnama and I hold that the confiscation is bad and set aside the same along with redemption fine - So far the handicrafts goods at Annexure-B to the inventory admittedly there is no evidence of such goods being of third country origin and there are also the declared goods as per the Bill of Entry valued at Rs. 2, 13, 522/- and accordingly the confiscation set aside. So far the undeclared goods being personal effects valued at Rs. 4700/- admittedly belonging to R.C. Sharma is concerned the confiscation set aside in view of the admission by the said R.C. Sharma being an employee of the Government of India and the facts stated by him have not been found to be untrue and further the goods were of very small value and admittedly personal effects. So far the goods at Annexure-E to the Panchnama being undeclared handicrafts value at Rs. 1, 45, 200/- is concerned. these goods are liable to confiscation but the appellant-exporter Smt. Kamla Shreshta of M/s Pramila Handicrafts is entitled to redemption on payment of redemption fine Rs. 25, 000/-. So far the two trucks are concerned there is no finding save and except presumptions that the owners of the said trucks and its staff being drivers and cleaners were knowingly transporting any contraband goods. In this view of the matter confiscation and redemption fine set aside. So far the penalty imposed u/s 112 of the Act is concerned considering the overall facts and circumstances and my findings hereinabove the penalty imposed on Smt. Kamla Shreshta reduced from Rs. 25, 000/- to Rs. 15, 000/- on Shri D.D. Pant from Rs. 30, 000/- to Rs. 5, 000/-. Further reduce the penalty on Shri Hari Kumar Thakuri from Rs. 20, 000/- to Rs. 5000/- - So far the other appellants and/or parties are concerned the penalties imposed on them fully set aside. Appeal allowed - decided partly in favor of appellant.
|