Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
π¨ Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
β οΈ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2018 (12) TMI 1210 - AT - Income TaxAllowable business expenditure - Personal expenditure - Expenses on education of the daughter of one of the directors of the assessee company at the Boston University which included college fee boarding travelling from India and back and other incidental expenses have been incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the business and allowable u/s 37(1) - Held that - The assessee is before us in second round of proceedings. In first round the Tribunal questioned the assessee about the fact whether at the time of making application for admission to the MBA program the company had sponsored Ms. Esha Arya or she had applied independently. The assessee was not able to furnish a copy of application for admission to the Boston University. In view of failure to substantiate the fact of a sponsoring by the assessee company the Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the AO directing the assessee to file all evidences starting from the making of the application till making the last payment for determining whether the expenditure was incurred by the directors of the company out of love and affection towards their daughter or it was an expenditure incurred in the course of the business of the assessee. As far as requirement of the filing of the application form AO has noted that no original application was filed by the assessee before him. CIT(A) has also noted that no copy of application for admission was filed by the assessee before him. He has also noted that no other evidence have been filed related to documents submitted during visa interview before the USA Embassy Authorities. Thus it is evident that the assessee has not complied with the direction of the Tribunal issued at the time of remanding the matter back to the Assessing Officer. Before us also only information sheet/medical & physical history of the student has been filed and copy of admission form has not been filed. We find that the assessee has accepted the decision of the Tribunal in first round of proceedings and no appeal has been filed against the said direction of the Tribunal. In such circumstances not complying with the direction of the Tribunal itself is sufficient to dismiss the appeal of the assessee. In addition to the above the documents filed in relation to the remitting of foreign exchange through M/s Thomas Cook private limited nowhere demonstrate that payments were made as part of the sponsoring agency for furtherance of the business interest of the assessee company. We also find that the assessee has failed to justify its claim of appointment of Ms Esha Arya as a whole time director of the company barely at the age of 18 years without any relevant educational qualification or experience. - Decided against assessee.
|