Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2019 (7) TMI 1098 - HC - Income TaxReopening of assessment u/s 147 - reopening on the basis of retrospective insertion of clause (i) to explanation 1 to Section 115-JB of the Act whereby provisions for diminution in the value of any asset is required to be added to the book profit for the purposes of Section 115-JB - following Jurisdiction High Court CIT(A) held that retrospective amendment in law does not give to any failure to disclose material facts as contemplated in the first proviso - HELD THAT - The question of law as proposed by the Revenue is squarely covered by the two decisions which have been referred to by the Tribunal in its impugned order. The principle of law as explained in the two decisions of this Court is that the retrospective amendment to any provision cannot be a ground for making re-assessment. Thus the proposed question is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Vodafone West Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax 2013 (7) TMI 536 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT and Sadbhav Engineering Ltd. 2014 (6) TMI 296 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT .
|