Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2019 (9) TMI 643 - AT - Central Excise100% EOU - Clandestine removal - diversion of goods to DTA instead of EOU - penalty u/r 25 of Central Excise Rules 2002 - HELD THAT - As per facts of the case it is not case of clandestine removal as the appellant have cleared goods initially which was meant for another EOU and clearances was made ARE-3 against CT-3 certificate. It is only due to the cancellation of the order the appellant was compelled to divert the goods to DTA for which necessary permission was obtained from the Deputy Commissioner therefore there is no malafide intention on the part of the appellant. Penalty cannot be upheld - appeal dismissed - decided against Revenue.
|