Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2020 (4) TMI 477 - AT - Income TaxComputation of tax u/s 115JB - not granting MAT credit u/s 115JAA including surcharge and cess as claimed by the assessee - HELD THAT - As decided in M/S VIRTUSA (INDIA) PVT. LTD. VERSUS DCIT CIRCLE 17 (2) HYDERABAD 2016 (3) TMI 245 - ITAT HYDERABAD the tax liabilities for normal provisions as well as MAT are calculated with surcharge and cess. The MAT credit in row 7 are calculated automatically using the prescribed algorithm this is nothing but balancing figure i.e. the difference between tax liability as per normal provisions and MAT provisions. Both the above tax liabilities are calculated with surcharge and cess. These are the standard format which are expected to be followed by all the assessees and also important to note that the above format of ITR 6 was amended w.e.f. AY 2012-13 by CBDT. Moreover this is more relevant for the department also. These formats are regulated by CBDT. Assessing Officer cannot overlook these formats and (interpret it in his own method of calculating tax credit while making assessment u/s 143(1) of the Act.) proceed to calculate the MAT credit to compute assessment u/s 143(1) applying different methods when the proper and correct method as proposed by CBDT in ITR-6. The Assessing Officer is expected to follow the ITR-6 format to complete the assessment u/s 143(1) or 143(3) of the Act. Apex court decision in the case of K. Srinivasan 1971 (11) TMI 2 - SUPREME COURT may not have been brought to the knowledge of the ITAT Delhi. Moreover the explanation 2 of section 115JB is applicable to calculate tax liability u/s 115JB and the same explanation should also be applied for giving credit u/s 115JAA. The tax liabilities calculated u/s 115JB by applying the explanation 2 the tax liability so computed are remitted by the assessee and then the same was carried forward for future MAT credit. In our view while calculating the MAT credit u/s 115JAA the same explanation 2 in section 115JB must be applied. The assessee had followed the procedure properly and the Assessing Officer had made the calculations applying his own interpretation or relied on the programme we are not sure whether it is programme hitch or the interpretation of Assessing Officer was not in line with the calculations proposed in ITR-6. Therefore we delete the addition made. - Decided in favour of assessee.
|