Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2021 (3) TMI 1144 - SC - Indian LawsSale of Electoral Bonds under the Electoral Bond Scheme 2018 - Scheme allows the donors of political parties to maintain anonymity - seeking direction to all national and regional political parties to mandatorily disclose complete details about their income expenditure donations and funding as well as full details of the donors - HELD THAT - It is not correct to say that the RBI was opposed to the Scheme in principle. RBI s objection was to the issue of bonds in scrip form rather than in demat form. What RBI wanted to achieve was in their own words the twin advantage of (i) providing anonymity to the contributor; and (ii) ensuring that consideration for transfers is through banking channels and not cash or other means. In fact RBI called Electoral Bonds as an enduring reform consistent with the Government s digitization push . Therefore the concerns expressed by RBI to the form and not to the substance cannot really advance the case of the petitioners. Despite the fact that the Scheme provides anonymity the Scheme is intended to ensure that everything happens only through banking channels. While the identity of the purchaser of the bond is withheld it is ensured that unidentified/ unidentifiable persons cannot purchase the bonds and give it to the political parties. Under clause 7 of the Scheme buyers have to apply in the prescribed form either physically or online disclosing the particulars specified therein. Though the information furnished by the buyer shall be treated confidential by the authorised bank and shall not be disclosed to any authority for any purposes it is subject to one exception namely when demanded by a competent court or upon registration of criminal case by any law enforcement agency. A nonKYC compliant application or an application not meeting the requirements of the scheme shall be rejected. Under Section 129(1) such financial statements should give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company and comply with the accounting standards notified under Section 133. These financial statements are to be placed at every Annual General Meeting of the company. Under Section 137 a copy of the financial statement along with all the documents duly adopted at the Annual General Meeting shall be filed with the Registrar of Companies - The financial statements of companies registered under the Companies Act 2013 which are filed with the Registrar of Companies are accessible online on the website of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs for anyone. They can also be obtained in physical form from the Registrar of Companies upon payment of prescribed fee. Since the Scheme mandates political parties to file audited statement of accounts and also since the Companies Act requires financial statements of registered companies to be filed with the Registrar of Companies the purchase as well as encashment of the bonds happening only through banking channels is always reflected in documents that eventually come to the public domain. All that is required is a little more effort to cull out such information from both sides (purchaser of bond and political party) and do some match the following . Therefore it is not as though the operations under the Scheme are behind iron curtains incapable of being pierced. The apprehension that foreign corporate houses may buy the bonds and attempt to influence the electoral process in the country is also misconceived. Under Clause 3 of the Scheme the Bonds may be purchased only by a person who is a citizen of India or incorporated or established in India - in the light of the fact that the Scheme was introduced on 2.1.2018; that the bonds are released at periodical intervals in January April July and October of every year; that they had been so released in the years 2018 2019 and 2020 without any impediment; and that certain safeguards have already been provided by this Court in its interim order dated 12.4.2019 we do not see any justification for the grant of stay at this stage. Application dismissed.
|