Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2021 (4) TMI 920 - HC - Income TaxAssessment u/s 153A r.w.s. 153C - as per assessee seized material do not incriminate either of the petitioners. The seized materials are commercial documents relating to medical equipments purchased by MMHRC Madurai. Depreciation was claimed in respect of those equipments and the same was also granted. Therefore it is not open to the assessing officer to reopen such concluded matters - HELD THAT - The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners took immense pains to drive home his contention that since the documents in question pertain only to the AY 2014-15 the assessment order of M/s.S.R.Trust cannot be reopened in respect of other years. This contention appears to be very attractive but on a deeper scrutiny we are not able to accept the same. It is true that the seized material bears the dates for the period from January 2014 to March 2014. But again these dates cannot be taken at their face value. Only after enquiry one can come to the conclusion regarding the actual period to which they relate. We may refer to chaos theory in this regard. The hypothesis of Edward Lorenz is that the mathematical models for weather systems can be extremely sensitive to initial conditions and that small changes in these initial conditions can result in big effects. The flapping of butterfly in Toronto can cause a typhoon in Tokyo. Correspondence between the two is revealed only with the benefit of hindsight. It is true that while taking action under Section 153C of the Act the assessments can be reopened only for the period that correspond to the seized material. The question of correspondence with the assessment period has to be borne in mind when final order is passed. At the initial stage the correspondence cannot be formulated with precision. Things may appear fuzzy at the beginning. Only an enquiry can unearth the entire truth. At the initial stage certain leeway has to be given to the authorities. The statute itself prescribes the ceiling limit. The long arm of the department cannot extend beyond a point. I am therefore of the view that it would be against public interest to abort the efforts taken by the department to unearth the escaped income. Initiation of the impugned action cannot be said to be without basis. They are grounded on solid material. In fact immediately after the seizure of the material the impugned action was not taken. The officials examined many other persons and statements were also recorded. Only after fully satisfying himself the assessing officer chose to issue the impugned notices. If the petitioners have nothing to fear they can as well place all the materials before the assessing authority for consideration. We are satisfied with the jurisdictional facts exist for assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153A as well as Section 153C of the Act. I do not find any illegality or infraction of procedure in the action initiated by the respondents. The writ petitions lack merit.
|