Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued soon
Home
2021 (9) TMI 646 - AT - CustomsRefund of Additional Customs Duty - benefit of notification dated 17 March 2012 - rate of Additional Duty was reduced - incidence of Additional Duty passed on or not - principles of unjust enrichment - entitlement to amendment of the Bills of Entry or for correction of the Bills of Entry - sections 149 and 154 of the Customs Act - HELD THAT - The Telangana High Court in M/S. SONY INDIA PVT. LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER 2021 (8) TMI 622 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT examined almost a similar controversy as has been raised in these two appeals. The appellant therein had imported mobile phones in India for trading purposes during the period 04.08.2014 to 29.01.2015. At the time of import of the mobile phones the petitioner had not claimed any exemption under serial no. 263A (ii) of the Exemption Notification which allowed payment of Additional Duty at the rate of 1% only in the Bills of Entry in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in M/S SRF LTD. M/S ITC LTD VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS CHENNAI COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT AND GENERAL) NEW DELHI 2015 (4) TMI 561 - SUPREME COURT . The petitioner in view of the decision in Supreme Court in ITC made an application for amendment of the Bills of Entries under section 149 of the Customs Act so that after that the duty could be refunded. The application filed by the petitioner was however rejected. In view of the decisions of the Bombay High Court in DIMENSION DATA INDIA PRIVATE LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND ANR. 2021 (1) TMI 1042 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT and the Telangana High Court in M/S. SONY INDIA PVT. LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER 2021 (8) TMI 622 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT the respondent can take recourse to appropriate proceedings including the provisions of sections 149 and 154 of the Customs Act for either amendment of the Bills of Entry or for correction of the Bills of Entry. It is expected that if such applications are now filed by Vivo Mobile the same would be adjudicated expeditiously as the refund applications were filed in 2015. It is therefore ordered that in the event applications are now filed by Vivo Mobile they shall be decided expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of the applications - Appeal disposed off.
|