Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2022 (12) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2022 (12) TMI 154 - HC - CustomsFixation of the minimum price for importation of betel nuts? - authority of the Central Government to regulate the importation of betel nuts otiose resulting in creating a precedence by which the Central Government shall not have the power to regulate and/or control the importation of any item - power and competence of the DGFT to issue notification restricting the importation of betel nuts below the CIF value fixed by the DGFT - Whether the Learned Tribunal failed to appreciate that the tariff value fixed by the importer and duty paid thereunder is not at all applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case nor the same has any legal validity in view of the fact that the tariff value fixed by the importer in its shipping bill has been annulled and/or overridden due to the notification issued by the DGFT in fixing the CIF value of betel nuts for the purpose of importation? HELD THAT:- The issue involved in this appeal is as regards the effect of the notification issued under the provisions of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. The learned Tribunal had followed the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/S INTERNATIONAL SEAPORT DREDGING LTD. VERSUS CC & ST, VISAKHAPATNAM-CUS [2016 (11) TMI 176 - CESTAT HYDERABAD] and held that the betel nuts which were imported by the respondent by declaring the prices which were less than the minimum import price specified by the DGFT cannot be held as import of prohibited goods. Consequently, the order of confiscation was set aside along with the order for payment of redemption fine and penalty. As rightly pointed out by the learned standing counsel for the revenue, the law on the subject as settled by this Court and subsequently by the Hon’ble Supreme Court could not be placed before the Tribunal for its consideration, the first of the decisions being the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in the case of UNION OF INDIA VERSUS NAVIN KR. JHA, ARUP KUMAR GARAI, M/S. SHEROWALI VANIJYA PVT. LTD., SOUMEN DAS, MOHAMMED SABEER, SUNIL AGARWAL, ANGKITA DHAR, RAHUL SOMANI, ARJUN KUMAR CHAUDHURY, MOHAMMED RAZA, M/S. S.S. TRADING CO., AMIT KUMAR, M/S. MAA BARA SHYAMA ENTERPRISES, BIMAL KUMAR MODI, M/S. STAR EXIM AND KANIKA DHAR @ KANIKA DEY DHAR [2016 (2) TMI 1350 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT]. An identical issue arose for consideration in the said case where the intra-court appeal by the Union of India was against an order passed in a batch of writ petitions whereby the notification dated 13th May, 2013 imposing price restrictions by exercising the powers under Section 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 was set aside. The matters are remanded back to learned Tribunal for fresh consideration, to take note of the decision referred to above as well as the decisions and submissions which may be placed before the Tribunal during the course of hearing and a reasoned and speaking order be passed by the learned Tribunal in accordance with law. Appeal allowed by way of remand.
|