Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2024 (1) TMI 1303 - HC - Money LaunderingMoney laundering - proceeds of crime - issuance of summons - whether the respondents can issue summons to anyone under the garb of investigation to examine whether there exists proceeds of crime on the basis of the four First Information Reports relating to the scheduled/predicate offence and to call everyone in this State on mere assumption that every case registered for offence relating to illegal mining coupled with scheduled offence is capable of generating proceeds of crime as a result of crime committed under the schedule? HELD THAT - The Hon ble Supreme Court had occasion to record the statement of the learned Additional Solicitor General while deciding the case in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary 2022 (7) TMI 1316 - SUPREME COURT that the Enforcement Directorate had taken up 2086 cases for investigation in the last five years under the PMLA 2002 out of registration of approximately 33 lakh First Information Reports relating to predicate offences by the police and other enforcement agencies. That means only 0.063% of cases registered for predicate offence is being investigated under the PMLA 2002. If an investigation is permissible on mere assumption of commission of predicate offence in lakhs of cases based on registration of similar cases that requires summons being issued to lakhs or even crores of persons throughout the country. Therefore this Court should step in to draw the lakshman rekha by prescribing a well-defined and guarded procedure in the matter of investigation. The investigation cannot be like an unruly horse with the possible mischief and misuse of power by irresponsible officers who can be politically motivated or can act with ulterior motive causing immense hardships and irretrievable damage to many innocent. When the involvement of any of the petitioners either in the commission of predicate offence or the suspected generation of proceeds of crime as a result of criminal activity relating to the scheduled offence or about petitioners knowledge is not shown by any verifiable material the question to be considered is whether the proceedings under the PMLA 2002 would survive at all against petitioners when no criminality is suspected connecting the petitioners either to the scheduled offence or about the involvement of the petitioners through anyone who is shown as accused in the PMLA proceedings. The offence under Section 3 of the PMLA 2002 is dependent upon illegal gain of property as a result of criminal activity relating to scheduled offence that there can be no offence of money-laundering against anyone claiming such property being the property linked to stated scheduled offence through him. When the criminal case against any individual for the predicate offence is quashed by the Court of competent jurisdiction or the person accused for the predicate offence is finally discharged or acquitted this Court has to quash the PMLA proceedings - Though absolute power is given to respondents under the PMLA 2002 when such power is exercised in a manner affecting the civil right and liberty of individuals especially when the power is exercised with oblique motive or the impugned proceedings suffer from legal mala fides. The Hon ble Supreme Court has categorically held that all properties recovered or attached through investigating agency even in connection with the criminal activity relating to scheduled offence in the general law cannot be regarded as proceeds of crime. This Court finds prima facie case and balance of convenience in favour of the petitioners and hence considering the serious prejudice that is likely to be caused on account of repeated summons being issued by the respondents to the petitioners in these writ petitions is inclined to grant interim protection - Petition disposed off.
|